Ethekwini residents are livid after discovering that their municipality has secretly signed an agreement with cellphone giant MTN to erect cellphone antennae in Durban, bypassing public participation planning regulations.
The city also “lied” to residents about the proposed new cellphone masts calling them a city-wide CCTV project which would include licence-plate recognition cameras. As a result, residents are blaming the slew of newly built transmitters for a wave of unbearable symptoms similar to radiation sickness.
In September 2016, residents in several Durban suburbs noticed workmen erecting large concrete towers in open city spaces such as traffic islands. Wondering whether these were new cellphone masts, concerned residents approached their councillors and the city administrators for clarity.
But the eThekwini Metro spokesperson, Tozi Mthethwa, reassured the community that the towers were not for cellphone antennae, but that the eThekwini Municipality had embarked on a city-wide CCTV project that would include licence-plate recognition cameras.
Mthethwa said at the time that the project was in line with the Municipal Integrated Development Programme which strives to create a “safe” and “smart” city.
“The objective was to reduce crime in various parts of the city as well as to have coverage of parts of the city where high levels of crime have been reported,” said Mthethwa in a statement.
“These cameras are monitored 24 hours, 365 days a year”.
City Press has been discovered that Mthethwa concealed the fact that the towers were the result of a secret deal struck with MTN by the city’s head of disaster management, Vincent Ngubane, which would allow the cellphone company to circumvent the public participation process that was required for the building of new cellphone infrastructure.
MTN’s national property manager, Gerard Naidoo, confirmed in a telephone interview that MTN had undertaken a “municipal infrastructure agreement” with Ethekwini that allowed the company to “share municipal infrastructure”.
The understanding, said Naidoo, was that where infrastructure existed, such as high-mast lighting, telephone poles and CCTV surveillance towers, MTN would “share the structure” for installation of their equipment.
Naidoo claimed that the arrangement was “above board” and done “in good faith” with eThekwini management. He referred additional queries to the city.
MTN had previously had several applications for new towers opposed by residents, who feared health risks and property devaluation as a result of the proximity of the towers.
Homeowners were therefore surprised and outraged when the completed “surveillance” towers were fitted with cellphone antennae instead of cameras. In some cases the masts included a camera perched on top, but in most cases the towers were purpose-built cellphone masts, put up without the necessary public participation process required by municipal planning laws.
Initially the masts sported metal plates with the name of the service provider that had constructed the towers, naming the client as MTN. These were later removed.
One of these service providers, Tellumat, confirmed via a telephone interview that they were solely contracted to erect cellphone towers for MTN.
At the time that the towers came into operation, hundreds of residents living in the vicinity of the towers began experiencing mysterious headaches, muscle pain, depression and a number of other symptoms.
In Glenwood, where 10 antennae were erected in a one-kilometre radius without a public participation process, resident Andre van Rooyen and his wife landed in hospital with a mysterious debilitating illness.
“I started talking to people in the neighbourhood and I discovered that all my neighbours were suffering from the same symptoms. These symptoms were identical to those listed in a number of scientific studies into the effects of cellphone radiation. We were directly opposite a cell tower that had been built in a road below us,” he said.
In Merebank, a tower was erected on school premises and almost immediately residents began experiencing symptoms of headaches, dizziness, muscle pain and depression. Community worker Yusuf Vawda has collected 600 signatures from residents who want the towers removed.
In Chatsworth, Woodhurst residents have approached the high court to have a tower dismantled. They say was erected without following due process.
MTN has referred all queries from residents to the municipality, saying that the shared agreement was administered by the city’s disaster management unit, and that MTN followed all the legal and planning requirements as specified by the municipality.
Ngubane, the man who is named as the person who agreed to the “infrastructure sharing” arrangement, refused to be interviewed.
The city communications department, approached with a request to clarify their misleading public statement, also refused to respond.[SOURCE: CITY PRESS]